Connect with us

Entertainment

The NFL’s fantastic football series has been canceled.

Published

on

The NFL's fantastic football series has been canceled. Techydeed.com

Playmakers was a groundbreaking drama about the lives of professional football players that premiered in 2003. In 2022, good luck watching it.

When ESPN announced the cancellation of Playmakers, a highly acclaimed and popular drama about the lives of professional football players that aired for a single season in 2003, they were clear about why: it had enraged the NFL. “We’re not in the business of antagonizing our partner,” said Mark Shapiro, then-executive vice president of ESPN, “even though we’ve done it and continued to carry it despite the NFL’s protestations.” “Bringing it back would be a slap in the face to our partner.”

Outside of the actual Saturday and Sunday primetime football games, Playmakers was ESPN’s highest-rated program at the time. Almost 20 years later, playmakers are hard to come by now. You can buy it on DVD and presumably download it illegally, but there is no way to watch it online. It’s noticeable by its absence.” Michael Angeli, co-executive producer, told me, “It was basically wiped out of existence.”

The show’s obscurity is regrettable because it’s a compelling and gritty portrayal of professional football that still stands up over two decades later. The fictional Cougars’ athletes’ lives are chronicled in Playmakers. The pilot begins with middle linebacker Eric Olczyk feeling great guilt about accidently paralyzing a member of the opposing team, a harsh and realistic portrayal of pro football. Later, we meet rookie running back Demetrius Harris, who is addicted to crack and other drugs; the team’s extremely dislikeable owner, who does everything he can to help Harris hide his drug use and involvement in violent crimes from the league; and a veteran running back attempting to reclaim his starting position, even if it means using performance-enhancing drugs.

Advertisement

EISENDRATH TOLD ME, “I HAD NO EXPECTATION THAT IT WOULD BE CONTROVERSIAL.” “I was understandably naive.”

It’s not surprising, therefore, that the NFL was wary of a show that concentrated on the darker aspects of their sport. According to commissioner Paul Tagliabue at the time, Playmakers was “one-dimensional and traded in racial stereotypes,” a “gross mischaracterization of our sport.” Despite this, the show was well received by both NFL players and critics. According to the New York Times, “Playmakers is “fully written and well played”—professional football as witnessed by Joan Didion rather than John Madden, according to the New York Times. According to reports, Deion Sanders thought it was a realistic portrayal of the NFL, and program creator John Eisendrath remarked that “a lot of players appreciated it.” He recalled Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb being “outspoken and supportive of it” when it was on the air.

Eisendrath informed me, “I had no expectation that it would be controversial.” “Clearly, I was naive.” He claimed he created the show because he wanted to learn more about male relationships and thought athletics would be a good “scaffolding” for discussing men’s emotional lives.

“I envisioned what the individual players were terrified of, and what has scared them the most in their lives, and I constructed the entire thing around that emotion,” he added. “I believe the fear of being wounded, the fear of harming someone, the fear of failure, and the fear of being replaced is a significant part of athletics.”

Charles Holland, a consulting producer on the show, told me he was disappointed when he realized it had been canceled since he enjoyed writing for it, but canceled shows are a part of working in Hollywood. The late Steven Bochco once told me that no matter what program you do, it will be canceled. It’s simply a matter of when, “he explained.

Despite its popularity, the show was not taken up by another network. “We attempted to sell it somewhere,” Angeli explained. “No one was willing to touch it.” I’m sure it was due to the NFL’s pressure on everyone.

Advertisement

For the past decade, we’ve had more open discussions about the NFL’s realities: CTE’s consequences, the prevalence of domestic abuse, the league’s silence on player protests, and, most recently, its discriminatory hiring practices. Many of these events were dramatized by the Playmakers before they became well known. “It’s the best product ever made about football,” Holland added, “and I believe we clearly suffered from being ahead of our time.”

“THE WORLD OF MAJOR LEAGUE SPORTS IS OUT OF YOUR REACH.”

I mentioned to Eisendrath that if it had aired 10 years later, it might have been picked up by a streaming service like Netflix. After all, another football show, Friday Night Lights, was rescued by DirecTV after being canceled by NBC.

He said, “No fucking way.” It’s why, since Playmakers, no show has tackled the world of professional sports with the same level of harsh honesty. While Friday Night Lights dealt with injuries, race, and class in high school football, it avoided taking digs at the NFL. The league’s TV rights are now among the most competitive among networks and streaming services, with a value of over $100 billion for the next decade.

“Today, more than ever, the heads of major league sports commissioners are the most powerful among the most powerful individuals in Hollywood.” Sports are the last remaining behemoth of live TV ratings, which is why they’re so powerful, “Eisendrath explained. And that’s why, since then, there hasn’t been a single show like Playmakers. Any profession in America can be dramatized, including physicians, lawyers, and policemen. You can show them doing whatever you want. You may show the president in the White House suffering from a blowout. However, you are unable to enter the world of professional league sports. “

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Gaming

The launch will not allow you to edit multiplayer maps or play Halo Infinite in co-op

Published

on

By

The launch will not allow you to edit multiplayer maps or play Halo Infinite in co-op techydeed.com

These will be added to the game over time.

Halo Infinite will be released this holiday season. However, at launch, you won’t have the ability to play campaign mode with your friends or edit multiplayer levels using Forge mode. Developer 343 Industries announced Friday.

“When we looked at these experiences — campaign coop and Forge – we made the determination [that] that they’re just simply not ready,” Joseph Staten (head of creative on Halo Infinite) said in a video. “So campaign co-op will be kept in the oven for a bit longer. We’ll release them next year as part of our season roadmap when they’re complete.

Also Read:

Call of Duty: Warzone, Destiny, and Warzone are moving to combat cheaters

Advertisement

The latest trailer for Pokemon Legends: Arceus shows big changes in battles

Fortnite’s obvious copying is not popular with developers in the US

CAMPAIGN CO-OP IS TARGETED FOR SEASON TWO, WHILE FORGE IS SET FOR SEASON THREE

Staten stated that 343 Industries plans to ship campaign co-op and Forge in the second season. Staten stated that 343 Industries aims to ship a new season approximately every three months. This means that campaign co-op will likely arrive around three months after launch, while Forge will arrive six months later.

Halo’s campaign cooperative and Forge mode are two hallmarks of the series, so fans may be disappointed to learn that they won’t be available at launch. However, 343 remains committed to launching the campaign this holiday season and season one multiplayer.

Advertisement

Staten said, “We’ll soon be discussing our actual release date.” Xbox is hosting an event in just a few days on August 24th, so perhaps Microsoft and 343 Industries will reveal the date there.

HALO INFINITE HAS HAD A BIT OF ROCKY HISTORY

The latest delays in campaign co-op, Forge and Forge are all part of Halo Infinite’s recent history. The original release date for the game was 2020. However, it was delayed to 2021 after a campaign that revealed the origins of the Craig meme. Staten, who was involved in the initial three Halo games, was brought on board soon after.

Despite its slow development, however, the recent multiplayer technical preview was very positive. This could suggest that the game will live to fans’ expectations when it finally releases this holiday season. You’ll need to wait for the game to be released to play it with your friends or modify it in Forge mode.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Disney responds to Scarlett Johansson’s Black Widow lawsuit

Published

on

By

Disney responds to Scarlett Johansson's Black Widow lawsuit techydeed.com

Disney wants to settle this matter privately; Johansson’s lawyers don’t agree.

Disney filed a motion for Scarlett Johansson to move her lawsuit against the company to private arbitration. This is the latest development in the ongoing case against the company regarding the Black Widow streaming release.

Disney’s lawyers filed the motion Friday in Los Angeles Superior Court because Periwinkle Entertainment, which negotiated her deal, agreed that any claims related to her role in the Marvel film would be handled in confidential arbitration. Johansson’s claim that Marvel was compelled to break an agreement by its parent company Disney when Black Widow premiered on Disney Plus through Premier Access on the same day it went into theaters was also a part of the motion. The Hollywood Reporter earlier reported the move.

Johansson complained that the film’s simultaneous release reduced her potential earnings. A simultaneous streaming release also hampered the film’s box office permanence, affecting her bonuses. The question is whether the film should have been released as theatrical exclusivity. Disney’s motion states that Periwinkle’s Marvel contract “doesn’t mandate theatrical distribution” and does not require exclusive distribution.

Advertisement

According to the motion, any theatrical obligations were to be fulfilled by showings on “no lower than 1,500 screens.” The film debuted on over 9,600 scenes in the US and on 30,000 screens worldwide. Johansson claimed she had lost earnings due to the hybrid release model, but it is still unclear what was promised.

Echoing the comments made by Disney boss Bob Chapek at the company’s latest earnings call, the motion said that the “hybrid-release pattern” was the best for Black Widow and everyone attached to it.

Disney also updated its figures regarding Black Window’s success, showing that the film continues to make big profits at the box office and through early access rentals. The motion said that Black Widow had earned more than $367m in worldwide box office receipts and more than $125m in streaming and download receipts. This is a rare statistic about the success of a hybrid release, which was available in both theaters and on a streaming service. According to the company, Black Widow’s opening weekend box office figures exceeded those of Ant-Man, the Wasp, and Guardians of the Galaxy.

Disney’s lawyers revealed in the motion that it served Periwinkle a demand for private arbitration on August 10th, a little over a week after Johansson’s initial complaint was filed. Periwinkle was not yet responding to the motion. Disney reiterated its earlier position that the complaint was without merit.

Also Read: Scarlett Johansson says Black Widow has moved far away from hyper-sexualized depiction after iron man 2 in 2010

Advertisement

Johansson’s lawyers were not available for comment immediately. In a statement that The Hollywood Reporter cited, John Berlinski, her attorney, stated that Disney “knows Marvel’s promises to Black Widow a typical theatrical production ‘like its other movies’ had nothing to do with guaranteeing Disney wouldn’t cannibalize the box office receipts to increase Disney+ subscriptions.” We are excited to present the overwhelming evidence to prove that this is what happened.

In response to the initial complaint in late July, Disney said there was “no merit whatsoever to this filing.” The company also characterized the suit as “especially sad and distressing in its callous disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic,” adding that Johansson had earned $20 million to date.

Various entertainment industry organizations, including Women in Film and ReFrame, have criticized Disney’s response to the lawsuit. They claim that the “gendered attack has no place in a commercial dispute and contributes towards an environment in which men and women are perceived as less able to protect their interests without facing ad hoc criticism.” Elizabeth Olsen, a fellow Marvel Cinematic Universe star, also spoke out in support of Johansson in an interview with Vanity Fair last week.

Olsen stated, “I think she is so tough, and literally when I saw that, I was like, ‘good for you, Scarlett.’”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Even without Geralt, Nightmare of the Wolf captures the spirit of The Witcher

Published

on

By

Even without Geralt, Nightmare of the Wolf captures the spirit of The Witcher techydeed.com

Netflix’s new anime series is not for newcomers but fans.

Geralt of Rivia is the one thing that unites all the iterations of The Witcher — the original books, hit games, or the new live-action series — and it’s Geralt. In a rare fantasy series that often follows larger stories than one person, the heart of the series is made up of the lovably sad monster hunter. This is what makes Nightmare of the Wolf an anime spinoff available on Netflix. It’s a prequel, which shifts in time to show Geralt’s mentor Vesemir. He can be charming, playful, and have a voracious appetite in life.

It’s refreshing and does a great job exploring the mysteries of The Witcher universe without sacrificing the main points of the series. Nightmare of the Wolf may not be the most welcoming start point for the franchise, but it’s still a lot of fun.

The anime movie is a time-traveling animation that focuses on Vesemir’s childhood and life at two crucial points. It’s primarily about Vesemir’s upbringing and how he became a witcher. Witchers are mutated monster hunters who, from a young age, train to kill deadly creatures in exchange for cash. He fled servitude to seek respect and money to hunt monsters. However, he was unaware of the harsh reality at Kaer Morhen, which serves as his training ground.

Advertisement

Also Read: New trailer for The Witcher: Nightmare of the Wolf teases monster-hunting action

These scenes demonstrate the brutality of witcher training and allow us to see how people respond to trauma. Many witcher stories focus on how few candidates survive the process. In Nightmare of the Wolf, young boys are forced into a nightmare swamp to overcome seemingly impossible odds. If they survive, they are then subject to painful alchemy to increase their strength and senses. The people who make it can be as grim as Geralt, or they may hide their pain behind a lust after life like Vesemir.

The second half of the story is about Vesemir as he reaches the peak of his abilities. He is 70 years old, and he looks handsome, with a square jaw, mischievous smirk, and a beautiful, young face. He’s well-known for his ability to kill tough monsters and can now charge a high price. One of his earliest scenes depicts Vesemir in the bathtub, negotiating with an elf about his fee before finally deciding that he was too costly. Vesemir and his comrades are also faced with a dilemma because monsters seem to be rare. One witcher said, “We’re putting ourselves out of business with every monster that we kill.”

These two periods are interconnected, and they shed light on a very important relationship, namely between witchers (or monsters) and those they have sworn to destroy. I won’t spoil the surprise, but Nightmare of the Wolf answers questions that have been floating around message boards for years regarding the origins of the hunter and hunted. These new answers will change the way you view them both. These revelations may not be obvious to newcomers who aren’t already immersed in the intrigue of the Continent.

The good news is that Nightmare of the Wolf still makes for a great movie, even if you come in the cold. Animation has made the action more fluid, especially when Vesemir cuts his way through beasts with inhuman grace and makes smart-ass jokes. The smooth action is not surprising, considering Nightmare of the Wolf was created in Studio Mir by the same team that created shows like Kipo, The Legend of Korra, and Age of Wonderbeasts. Combat in live-action shows and games can feel slow and tedious, but things are faster and more dynamic in anime. Vesemir is the new lead. Geralt finds fighting tedious. Vesemir is a good sport. However, the battles are still intense. Nightmare of the Wolf is incredibly violent. You’ll see blood gushing from the limbs in just a few minutes.

Advertisement

Nightmare of the Wolf captures much of what made The Witcher so popular — a dark fantasy land, political intrigue, and buff men in the bathtub — but it doesn’t spend much time setting up the world. It assumes that you already care. This is especially true for the Big Twist. It won’t be much if you are not invested in the universe. The movie is still entertaining, with its gory action and many one-liners. However, it can feel like supplementary material that will keep you going until the second season.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2021 TechyDeed.

close